26 Nov 2009
Representatives of the British Athletes Commission yesterday attended the third seminar in the series of anti- doping research at Leeds Metropolitan University.
Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, the seminars are structured to raise debate on current issues surrounding anti-doping policy. The purpose of the series is to stimulate research within and across disciplines, inform policy and practice as well as contributing new knowledge to the area.
Hosted by Professor Barrie Houlihan of Loughborough University, a number of guest speakers were also present including, Pete Gardner of the BAC and David Kenworthy Chair of UK Anti-Doping (UKAD).
On the agenda, was the governance of organisations such as the international federations, WADA, NADOs and NGBs. One of the key issues raised was their accountability in relation to anti-doping.
‘To what extent are they accountable, who is accountable for what, to whom and in what ways?’ was the question raised.
Ex Police Sergeant turned UKAD Chair, David Kenworthy reiterated the importance of compliance with anti-doping procedures. He went on to say,
“We have to co-ordinate partnerships, it’s not just purely about sport- but looking after the athletes themselves.”
Stuart Miller of the ITF (International Tennis Federation), was keen to highlight that the athletes were the priorities,
“Athletes have to enjoy consistency in testing, they want to be able to know that the procedures are consistent. We have to build athlete friendly systems - but stay within the confines of policy.”
The ITF commissions an independent organisation to conduct testing worldwide on their behalf. They believe the key to success is for the National Associations to educate as well as co-operate with the IFs and most important of all avoid any potential conflict.
The matter of athletes ‘whereabouts’ was also on the programme. Miller agreed that it is a possible “infringement of their rights but also their duty as responsible professional athletes.”
Although it is an issue continually circled for debate, many of the nation’s elite are beginning to grasp it as standard procedure. Pete Gardner of the British Athletes Commission strongly believes that the concept is functioning,
“The whereabouts system is working- it is the best available system at the moment, and though improvements can, and need to be made, it’s being made as easy as possible for the athletes to comply with.”
Former athlete GB athlete, Gardner delivered the swift presentation from a more crucial angle, a view from those affected. He presented with reference to the athletes’ perception of the UK’s anti-doping policy.
“We must highlight the need for education. Athletes hear of negative cases and they have to know the associations are there to help. Together the associations have a job to do- so our voices are heard effectively.” He said.
The BAC impressed the fellow researchers with the in depth athletes perspective on the anti-doping policy. The specified case studies demonstrated the Commission’s persistent work in representing and aiding the athletes. Acting fast, efficiently and professionally, the BAC deem it critical to ensure the policies are created with the best interests of the athletes and sports at mind- a level playing field is vital in the competition driven sport we see today.
Comments